Previewing Pittsburgh
Opponent: Pitt Panthers
Record: 20-2 (8-1)
Last Five: 4-1
Venue: Peterson Events Center
TV: FSN Ohio/Big East Network/ESPN3
This will be brief because, let's face the fact straight away. It will take a herculean effort for this Cincinnati Bearcats team to beat Pittsburgh at the Peterson Events Center. Notre Dame game aside Pitt has done little wrong all season long. Their defense has been fantastic and their offense is currently rated as the most efficient outfit in the country by Kenpom.com. What makes this game a near lock for Pitt is their rebounding. When Yancy Gates and Ibrahima Thomas are interested and engaged in the game UC is a very good rebounding team, but neither of those guys is always interested and the moments when both of them have been interested have been few and far between. Both of those guys have to show up, that means no stupid fouls early, no hard shows and the inevitable reaches on the high pick and roll. It is vital for UC's chances for Yancy to play his customary 30+ minutes.
When I watched Ben Hansbrough eviscerate this Pitt defense during the Panthers only loss in the month of January I thought it might bode well for UC's chances in this game. But the cold eventuality dawned on me during this week off. Notre Dame went into that burn offense where they run the clock down give the ball to Hansborough and just let him go make a play and that worked wonders for the Irish, but I don't think that will work nearly as well for the Bearcats. UC is essentially in a burn offense all the time and the reason is simple. In Basketball as in Football the key for any team hoping to pull an upset is to shorten the game and limit possessions. That is what this UC team does all the time. UC plays so many games in the 60's because they always try to limit the oppositions possessions by playing on a geological time scale on offense and by making teams work on offense for 94 feet. What made the burn offense so effective for Notre Dame was Hansborough the Younger and his ability to first of all get quality shots off the dribble and second make them. That was the difference in that game down the stretch. The difference though is that UC can't use the Notre Dame gameplan to beat this Pitt team. There simply aren't enough players on the roster who can make the kind of plays Hansbrough made down the stretch in that game. UC has a ton of spot up shooters, a ton of guys who can make contested shots if their feet are set, but no one who can make pull up jumpers off the dribble. The only person who has shown the slightest propensity for doing just that in the past month and a half is Cashmere Wright who reigned jumpers on West Virginia last Saturday. Cash needs to have a better game against Pitt than he did against WVU for UC to have even the slightest chance. But when you look at his performance on a game by game basis last Saturday's performance was an anomaly. UC needs another offensive anomaly from Cash or someone else. If everyone on the team regresses to their mean offensively this game will be a slaughter.
4 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hard to object to that sentiment. I am secretly hoping that my ISP crashes and that I won't be able to follow the game. That would be great
by Matt Opper on Feb 4, 2026 10:39 PM EST up reply actions
Hey Matt,
sorry I could respond to your last comments made towards my last post when UC played WV. I went under the weather and was bed ridden. I said that UC doesn’t have a chance to make the dance with 22 wins and I firmly believe that. You were talking about RPI’s and things of such but if you recall UC at the end of last year will probably have a better RPI than this year. They didn’t get in the dance last year and they beat some of the top teams in this conference last year. They also had enough wins too. Though it didn’t happen. This year you maybe right about one thing, ST Johns would be our best wins (plural) that is if we beat them twice. If they come here and beat us at home then we won’t get 22 wins.
When I look at the remainder of the schedule this is what I see: beating St Johns, Providence, Depaul, and very possible Marquette. The rest are losses. That puts us at 22 wins. The only teams out of the ones we beat that could get into the dance would be St Johns and Marquette. Which would be our 2 best wins, which isn’t good enough.
IMO, the Tourney Selection Committee (TSC) doesn’t look at all the RPI of each and every team that UC plays, as to UCs own RPI, SOS, wins and defeats including how the outcome was in their defeats especially against the top teams. They do this for every team they consider.
So with that being said, If it turns out the way I predicted, which is 22 wins against no NCAA caliber teams (and I don’t care what the fuck the other teams RPI’s are), those teams are not going dancing either. There is one with an exception and that’s ST Johns, they actually will have some quality wins and really good ones. So if we beat St Johns twice and we have 22 wins at the end of the season and St Johns has 20 wins, St. Johns would get in before UC with quality wins and quality losses against top teams. St. Johns plays better against top teams period…..
Now if UC can only beat Pitt? Go Cats!
by WHYUS!! on Feb 5, 2026 1:54 PM EST up reply actions
BTW,
after watching this game the Big East analysts all said the same thing as I said and are going down fast in a hurry. They need some type of win against a team that has credentials and not just the ones in the bottom eight in the league. And then again here’s another bad loss and not a competitive loss. They talked all game about UC’s energy and where it goes to.They have it then they don’t. NIT bound again fellas!
Fire Cronin!! I’ve had enough of how he coaches! It’s a disgrace to the university and all the fans. We deserve better than a mediocre coach in a power conference like the Big East.
Oh, and Gates is suspended indefinitely for the reason of violating team rules. Go figure!
by WHYUS!! on Feb 5, 2026 8:47 PM EST up reply actions

by Matt Opper on 













